STUDY GROUP COMMITTEES
Recommendations for Noise Abatement Measures
Navigation Committee


       
go to Study Group Menu       Suggested Categories

• Runway use programs
• Flight track changes
• Approach and departure procedures
• Advanced navigation technology
• Airport facilities
• Airport use restrictions
• Airport regulations
• Measures to enhance, monitor, or enforce noise abatement

Runway Use Programs

• Alter preference for east runway

    Limit runway preference to daytime only
    Eliminate runway preference
    Reverse runway preference

• Raise tailwind threshold for reversing flow to 10 knots

• No exceptions to contraflow, unless emergency

Flight Track Changes

• Set uniform departure criteria for turning

    Altitude
    Distance
    Navigation markers
    Geographic features

• Make west runway divergence 15°, not 20

• Apply divergence to all departures on west runway

Approach and Departure

• Route all arriving traffic into IFR approach corridor - no cancellations
• No VFR
• Noise-optimal SIDs/STARs

Navigation Technology

• Ground-based

    markers
    beacons
    lasers
    other

• Airborne

    GPS/FMS (current vs milspec)
    microwave
    other

Airport Facilities

Referred to New Technologies Committee:

• “Hush houses”
• Counter-frequency generators

Airport Use Restrictions

• Conformance to noise compatibility program (NCP) by all aircraft

Airport Regulations

• Require NCP briefings for all tower personnel and pilots using SDF

Enhancing/Monitoring

• Show effect of full conformance to current NCP, compared to base case
• Noise monitoring
• Flight track monitoring

Screening Criteria

• Goals & objectives

    Study goals
    Study Group issues

• Reduces noise exposure

    Minimize incompatibilities
    Assess using noise model

• FAR Part 161

    Impact on interstate commerce
    Not discriminatory

• Consistent with FAA objectives

    Aviation safety
    Airspace management

• Feasible

    Cost analysis
    Monitorability

         

back to top